Choosing a TNC for APRS
One of the most common questions is "What TNC should I buy?".
The answer is easy, "it depends...". Mobile vs fixed, HF vs
VHF, stand alone tracker, digipeater, gateway--there are many ways of using a
TNC. The differences are mostly in the features. J
Stand Alone Tracker: The principle
requirement of a TNC in order to be used as a stand-alone tracker is the ability
to program the TNC to listen for the GPS data on the serial port, and transmit
the most recently heard data. Here is an area where competition has really help
APRS users...now every TNC includes this ability. If you already have an old TNC,
you may need to upgrade your firmware to take advantage of this feature.
There are several couple of popular options for stand alone trackers. The KPC-3
Plus is probably the most popular. Key features are low power consumption,
remote sysop functionality, multiple GPS sentences. Another excellent choice is
the PicoPacket. This unit features a small size and several
useful options for mobile and portable use. These include a battery pack, built
in GPS, and second serial port. This latter option deserves a little
explanation.
Most laptops only have a single serial port. This complicates things when you
want to run APRS in vehicle, since you need to talk to both a GPS and a TNC. The
easiest option is to buy a serial port PCMCIA card. The cheapest way is to buy
or build a hardware single port interface. This
uses one of the RS-232 control lines to switch between the GPS and the TNC. The
disadvantage is rather than a continuous stream of GPS data, the computer only
sees a position at a user-settable interval. With either of these methods when
you take the laptop out of the computer, the system will not function as a
stand-alone tracker without switching cables or building a complicated switching
arrangement, and reprogramming the TNC.
PacComm has a far more elegant solution. By adding a second RS-232 port to
the TNC, the GPS is always connected to the TNC. The PicoPacket senses when a
computer is attached, and turns off the stand-alone mode, letting the computer
control transmission. Remove or turn off the computer, and the TNC once again
goes into stand-alone mode. Very cool! If you want to use a TNC sometimes as a
stand-alone tracker and sometimes controlled by a laptop, the PicoPacket is
absolutely the best choice!
Mobile TNC's: Much of what was said
above about Stand-Alnone Trackers applies to this use. However, all TNCs run on
12 volts, and are acceptable for mobile use.
There are two more options. One is the Kenwood
TM-D700A, its a dual band mobile, with a built in TNC with APRS software.
Also available is its "portable" little brother the Kenwood
TH-G7AD. With either of these all you have to add is a GPS unit.
HF TNC's: With the demise of AEA, the
choices for HF TNC's have diminished. Many people felt the AEA PK-900 was the
best HF TNC available, but now most people seem to favor the KAM.
The primary competition is the MFJ-1278. The principle
difference is that the MFJ-1278 is not capable of simultaneous HF/VHF operation,
and therefore cannot be used as an HF to VHF gateway. There are rumors about a
new version of the Kantronics KPC-9612 that will add a third
modem (out of a choice of several, including HF)...if it includes simultaneous
use of all three modems it should be a winner.
Digipeaters: The unique feature useful
for digipeater TNCs is the remote sysop function. This allows the operator to
remotely change the parameters without needing to go to the digi site and
connecting a computer to the TNC. In this way, beacons and beacon rates can be
easily changed, as well as a number of other parameters. Be careful
though...changing the wrong parameter remotely may cause the TNC to hang. Both
Kantronics and PacComm have the remote sysop feature.
Shack TNC's: This use is perhaps the
least demanding, since there is no need for any fancy features. The biggest
choices are HF vs VHF, 9600 baud or PSK for domestic or satellite use. An older
less expensive AEA PK-88, or Kantronics KPC-2 will work fine.
If you will be using HF, especially as the GATE, the KAM
seems to be the most popular. If you wish to do 9600 baud for domestic or
satellite communications, the KPC-9612, would be the
majority choice.
The Baycom Modem A very common
question is "Can I use my Baycom modem with APRS?" The answer is no.
The Baycom is just a modem...it depends on the computer to interpret the packet.
This is fine for ordinary packet where a simple terminal interface will suffice.
However, adding support for the Baycom would require significant programming
effort on the part of the various APRS software authors, and the market is just
not large enough to justify this sort of effort.
The Players
The Kantronics KPC-3 Plus
Go to Kantronics' catalog
page.

Advanages
- low power consumption
- remote sysop capability
- GPS data logging capability
The Kantronics KAM
Go to Kantronics' catalog page.

Advanages
- Multi-mode (RTTY, CW, Fax, HF/VHF packet, AMTOR)
- Simultaneous HF/VHF operation
The Kantronics KPC-9612
Go to
Kantronics' catalog page.

Advanages
- Simultaneous 1200 baud/9600 baud operation
The PacComm Tiny-2 MK-II
Go to PacComm's catalog page.

Advanages
- Modem disconnect header (external modem capability)
- TAPR-2 TNC code capability (TheNet, ROSE, etc.)
The PacComm PicoPacket
Go to PacComm's catalog page.

Advanages
- Wide array of options
- Low power consumption
The MFJ-1270c
Go to MFJ's
catalog page.

Advanages
- Modem disconnect header (external modem capability)
- TAPR-2 TNC code capability (TheNet, ROSE, etc.)
The MFJ-1278b
Go to MFJ's
catalog page.

Advanages
- Multi-mode (RTTY, CW, Fax, HF/VHF packet, AMTOR)
Trancievers With Built In TNC's and APRS Software
|

Kenwood TH- D7AG |

Kenwood Tm-D700 |
|